The starting point is the changed guideline, such as a new version, a changed section, or a new limit value. The question is which product versions and projects are affected and which evidence needs to be reviewed again.
Scattered product information
New requirements have to be compared with features that live in different systems and documents.
Unclear scope
How many product versions, customers, and ongoing proposals are affected often remains open for a long time.
Repeated search for evidence
Evidence that has already been provided is gathered anew with every change.
GUIDED WORKFLOW
Exactly one changed passage, three documented links. Select a path. It shows the previous assessment, the new review question, and the owner.
INPUT
{{ cur.eingabe }}
SUPPORT FROM DECOTA
{{ cur.decota }}
YOUR TEAM’S ACTION
{{ cur.team }}
RESULT
{{ cur.ergebnis }}
WORK RESULT
For each affected object, it shows why it is affected, what was assessed before, what needs to be reviewed anew, and who is responsible. The list is the basis for the review, not the assessment itself.
REVIEW LIST · COLD OPERATION GUIDELINE V3.0
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLESeries P, revision 2 · Customer site A
Review openAffected because of cold verification down to −20 °C per version 2.0 · Review question: evidence down to −30 °C or grandfathering · Quality management, K. Bauer
Series P, revision 3 · in delivery
Evidence available, confirmation openTest report PB-0611 verifies −30 °C · Review question: does PB-0611 fully cover version 3.0 · Quality management, K. Bauer
Project Packaging line North · proposal in progress
Review openR-027 was assessed at −20 °C · Review question: must the proposal account for −30 °C · Application engineering, M. Hartmann
Only documented assignments appear in the list. Products or projects that are not recorded are not shown.
BENEFITS
BEFORE
Affected products are gathered per change from lists, drawings, and memory.
AFTER
Documented links show product versions and projects for the changed passage.
Metric: time to identify affected products
BEFORE
Who takes on which review is distributed by email and gets lost in the filing.
AFTER
Every review question has an owner and a status.
Metric: share of review tasks completed by experts
BEFORE
In an audit, it is hard to prove why a product version was considered affected or not affected.
AFTER
Previous assessment, new review question, and decision are shown together.
Metric: reviews with documented rationale
Your potential time savings
Run your own scenario with your own assumptions in the ROI calculator.
WHAT COMES NEXT
The same context from the perspective of a product version. Which requirements and guidelines apply to series P, revision 2?
To the application →ALONGSIDE
If the change leads to a new requirement in the ongoing proposal, it is checked against the variants there.
To the application →No. Whether and how a change applies to a product version is assessed by your department. DECOTA shows the links and the previous assessment.
From the documented assignments between guideline, version, product version, and project in your knowledge base. Products that are not recorded are not shown.
No. It is the basis for the review. Assessment, measures, and approval remain with the department.
Bring a guideline change from the past year. We show the workflow with your documents or with prepared sample data.
Book a demo